How Many Slaves?

Parallel Execution and the Magic of 2

That’s my second presentation, at 2:15 today. I’ve thought long and hard about this one and hope I’ve made the right decision. I was concerned about how to encapsulate a 50+ page paper into a one hour slot. I hate presentations which are full of detail, rushed, badly thought-out and throw a ton of slides up so quickly that nobody walks away with any meaning.

So here’s what I’m going to talk about

  1. Why I decided to write about this subject and I’ll reference Cary’s paper briefly.
  2. What decisions I had to make early on in the process about the test environments.
  3. Talk a little about the test scripts and tools I used, but not walk through the scripts in detail.
  4. A few key results and where I think I made mistakes.
  5. Some initial thoughts on what the results mean.
  6. Suggestions for others who might try similar test exercises, based on my experience of this one.
  7. What I’d like to test next

I generally hate fluffy presentations that lack any technical content, but this is going to be very light on technical content because I think the paper is there for anyone to read and spend more than an hour over. I’m also conscious of the fact it’s the last afternoon and I want to try to make it bearable if I can.

So, that’s fair warning (are you listening, Eric – it’s going to be a presentation, not a course! 😉 ) and I’ll make it clear at the start of the presentation too so that people have time to hit the exits if it’s not for them.

Personally, I think the whole process makes an interesting story anyway, and a light presentation will add something to the paper and hopefully encourage people to try a similar exercise for themselves. I hope I’m right!

5 comments

  1. It’s positively shameful for a Scotsman to leave his mates holding the “bar bill” bag. Exhaustion is simply not an excuse.

    Right.

    Excellent job on the presentation. I’m not just blowing smoke when I tell you that I added to my evaluation form that I hope they have more “Doug Burns” type presentations at the next meeting.

  2. Fabulous job with the two presentations, Doug. I enjoyed both the level of technical content and the engaging way with which you presented the material.

    And I second the notion of Eric presenting next year. He would no doubt have an interesting take on whatever topic he chose to present.

  3. Ooops! Sorry, chaps, I just assumed they’d keep putting drinks on it with no signature. Well, I suppose I just didn’t really think about it …

    What every David did seems to have done the trick, though. There’s a big number somewhere towards the end of that bill.

    Mark/Mike,

    Thanks very much for the positive comments. I enjoyed giving the two presentations this week and felt pretty comfortable with how it went, but it’s difficult to know for sure if people were happy with them, so I appreciate it. Hopefully I’ll get a chance to do it again next year (although just the one presentation would be more fun, I think!)

    Maybe see you again next year.

    Cheers,

    Doug

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *