{"id":976,"date":"2005-05-29T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-05-29T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/?p=976"},"modified":"2005-05-29T12:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-05-29T12:00:00","slug":"px-slave-trace-files","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/2005\/05\/29\/px-slave-trace-files\/","title":{"rendered":"PX Slave Trace Files"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s sad that it takes a Bank Holiday weekend for me to get round to doing some more research on parallel execution. Anyway, I was on the verge of modifying the following line from the PX paper &#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>The trace files for the slave processes may be created in background_dump_dest, rather than the standard user_dump_dest. This is version dependant and the trace file for the query coordinator will be in user_dump_dest in any case<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8230; because I&#8217;d yet to see the trace files appear in user_dump_dest and a comment on asktom had got me thinking &#8211; &#8216;Yes, px slaves are background processes so why would the trace files ever appear in user_dump_dest?&#8217;Then while I was playing around looking at how many slaves Oracle might assign to various statements using some scripts and suggestions from J Lewis, I noticed that the slave trace files are appearing in user_dump_dest. This is with 9.2.0.1.0 on Windows XP Home. I&#8217;m using 9.2 because I want to see the discrete SQL statements that the slaves are processing.So, just an interesting anomaly from what I&#8217;ve seen previously. I&#8217;ll check it out on other versions \/ OS in future.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s sad that it takes a Bank Holiday weekend for me to get round to doing some more research on parallel execution. Anyway, I was on the verge of modifying the following line from the PX paper &#8230; The trace files for the slave processes may be created in background_dump_dest, rather than the standard user_dump_dest.&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/2005\/05\/29\/px-slave-trace-files\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">PX Slave Trace Files<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-976","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":967,"url":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/2005\/07\/25\/a-small-follow-up\/","url_meta":{"origin":976,"position":0},"title":"A small follow-up","date":"July 25, 2005","format":false,"excerpt":"From a previous blog entry :-\"... I noticed that the slave trace files are appearing in user_dump_dest. This is with 9.2.0.1.0 on Windows XP Home. I'm using 9.2 because I want to see the discrete SQL statements that the slaves are processing. So, just an interesting anomaly from what I've\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1031,"url":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/2006\/07\/21\/monitoring-index-usage-ii-event-10132\/","url_meta":{"origin":976,"position":1},"title":"Monitoring Index Usage II &#8211; Event 10132","date":"July 21, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"That's a shame.I was hoping that setting the event at the instance level might generate one trace file in the background_dump_dest but, like event 10046, it generates one trace file per session in user_dump_dest. I should have expected that, but I suppose my optimism blinded me.It doesn't make event 10132\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1112,"url":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/2009\/10\/29\/10g-consolidated-trace-files-and-px\/","url_meta":{"origin":976,"position":2},"title":"10g Consolidated Trace Files and PX","date":"October 29, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"At the end of my Tracing Parallel Execution presentation at the Scottish OUG conference, Michael M\u00f8ller of Miracle asked whether the consolidated trace files produced by the DBMS_MONITOR package and trcsess utility are in strict time order. i.e. Will I see the actions of the query coordinator, then the actions\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 7 comments","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1030,"url":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/2006\/07\/21\/monitoring-index-usage\/","url_meta":{"origin":976,"position":3},"title":"Monitoring Index Usage","date":"July 21, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"A common requirement cropped up this week. A new Data Warehouse has just gone live and is still in the 'do we have the right indexes here' phase. In this case, the suspicion is that there are too many indexes in a specific schema and that a number of them\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 8 comments","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1320,"url":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/2007\/09\/23\/parallel-query-and-11g-part-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":976,"position":4},"title":"Parallel Query and 11g &#8211; Part 2","date":"September 23, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Now, that's weird. A little surprising might be more accurate and maybe I'm missing something.During the various tests with and without parallel hints and different parallel_io_cap_enabled settings, I expected the runs that didn't use parallelism to show up \"db file scattered read\" events in the trace files. For example, here's\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 10 comments","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1697,"url":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/2013\/03\/11\/not-all-deadlocks-are-created-the-same\/","url_meta":{"origin":976,"position":5},"title":"Not all Deadlocks are created the same","date":"March 11, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"I've blogged about deadlocks in Oracle at least once before. I said then that although the following message in deadlock trace files is usually true, it isn't always. The following deadlock is not an Oracle error. Deadlocks of\u00a0 this type can be expected if certain SQL statements are\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 issued. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/976","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=976"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/976\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=976"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=976"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orcldoug.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=976"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}